| 1 | Compare absorbency by test data, not only by labels | Total liquid capacity and retention performance | “Regular,” “heavy,” and “overnight” are not globally standardized terms. Request capacity in millilitres when available and ask whether the result comes from an internal or recognized test method. | Require the test method, sample size, conditioning details, and leakage or rewet results before making direct supplier comparisons. |
| 2 | Offer more than one absorbency level | Light, moderate, heavy, and postpartum-use options | Postpartum flow can change significantly during recovery. A practical range includes lighter daytime pads and higher-capacity pads for the first days or overnight use. | Use clear absorbency descriptions and avoid suggesting that one product is suitable for every stage of postpartum bleeding. |
| 3 | Check pad length and coverage area | Overall length, width, and rear coverage | Longer designs generally provide more front-to-back coverage. Many maternity pads are approximately 35–45 cm long, but actual dimensions vary by construction and target use. | Request a dimension drawing, unfolded measurements, and photos showing the front, center, and back width. |
| 4 | Evaluate the core structure | Fluff pulp, absorbent polymer, acquisition layer, and core distribution | A well-distributed absorbent core can improve liquid acquisition and reduce pooling. Superabsorbent polymer may increase capacity, but performance depends on its amount and placement. | Ask for material specifications, core weight, polymer content if disclosed, and cross-section samples. |
| 5 | Prioritize leakage-control design | Raised barriers, leg cuffs, side flaps, and back guard | Three-dimensional barriers and wider rear coverage can help manage side or back leakage, especially when lying down or moving. | Check barrier height, elasticity, attachment strength, and leakage performance under standing and lying-use simulations. |
| 6 | Compare wing shape and adhesive stability | Wing width, wing adhesive, center adhesive, and release paper | Wings can help hold the pad in position, but excessive adhesive or poor release paper can cause discomfort, residue, or tearing during application. | Test peel force, repositioning, adhesive residue, and compatibility with commonly used underwear fabrics. |
| 7 | Assess softness and skin-contact materials | Top sheet, surface friction, breathability, and lotion or fragrance content | A soft, breathable nonwoven top sheet may improve comfort. Fragrance and unnecessary additives can be unsuitable for sensitive skin. | Request the full material declaration, skin-contact safety documents, odor evaluation, and relevant irritation or sensitization testing. |
| 8 | Measure rewet and surface dryness | Surface dryness after fluid absorption and pressure | High capacity alone does not guarantee comfort. Lower rewet generally indicates less liquid returning to the skin after pressure is applied. | Request rewet results using the same liquid volume, waiting time, pressure, and test paper or measurement procedure. |
| 9 | Review hygiene and individual packaging | Individual wrap, seal integrity, dust protection, and disposal design | Individually wrapped pads support hygienic storage and transport. A wrapper that can be used for disposal adds convenience. | Inspect seal strength, opening ease, moisture protection, packaging cleanliness, and disposal instructions for the target market. |
| 10 | Confirm regulatory, labeling, and sustainability requirements | Product classification, labeling language, claims, materials, and disposal information | Requirements differ by destination. Absorbency, “organic,” “biodegradable,” and “flushable” claims should only be used when supported by appropriate evidence. | Check destination-country rules, ingredient or material disclosure, batch traceability, safety documentation, carton markings, and whether disposal claims are permitted. |